The Structural Framework, Implementation Strategies and Students’ Perception of Team Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education of a Medical School in Malaysia.

shahid hassan, Mohd Salami Bin Ibrahim, Nabiha Gul Hassan

Abstract


Abstract

 

Background: Delivery and implementation strategies are key to curriculum success. There is growing evidence that team-based learning (TBL) is an effective way of interactive teaching. TBL is a method that uses learning teams to enhance student engagement and quality of learning. Individual accountability for out-of-class reading is followed by individual and group assessment. In-class application exercises, which is the hallmark of team-based learning promotes both learning and team development. TBL uses educational principles of transforming traditional content into application of knowledge and problem solving skills in an interactive learning environment.

Objective: To know the structural framework and students’ perception about TBL in clinical setting of MBBS program in a Malaysian medical school.

Method: A total of 120 students assigned to 22 small subgroups of 5-6 per group. TBL was delivered in three phases. In phase I students were assigned reading material. In phase II students were assessed for individual and group performance followed by a mini-lecture. In phase III, in-class application of learning activity was performed. Finally peer assessment evaluated contribution of peer in TBL. A TBL Classroom Evaluation Inventory (TBLCEI) was developed to probe student’s perception of TBL. In addition students were asked to provide their estimated grade in end of the posting assessment. Grades were categorized into excellent pass >85%, high pass 70–84%; average to good pass 50-69% and fail <50%. These grades were measured against students’ TBLCEI survey score using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Result: Results of one-way analysis of TBLCEI scores differed significantly across four estimated end of posting achievers groups, F (3,116) = 52.279, p < 0.001. Bonferroni’s procedure of multiple comparisons indicated that mean value of TBLCEI score of High Pass significantly higher [70.90 (3.684)] than Good Pass [66.57 (3.625)], Pass [60.42 (3.583)] and Fail [57.67 (5.626)] at p < 0.001

Conclusion: It is concluded that medical students favourably liked teaching methods that useTBL as it increases students’ engagement in an outcome-based education. It also provided opportunities of frequent and immediate feedback with newly introduced IF-AT system, provided with partial credit in assessment.


Keywords


Team based learning, TBL framework, Students’ perception, TBL evaluation inventory, IF-AT System, Students’ engagement.

Full Text:

PDF

References


References:

Parmelee DX. Team-based learning in health professions education: Why is it a good fit? In: Michaelsen LK, Parmelee DX, McMahon KK, Levine RE (Editors). Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2007; p. 3–8.

Thompson B, Schneider VF, Haidet P, Levine RE, McMahon KK, Perkowski LC, Richards BF. Team-based leaning at ten medical schools: Two years later. Med Educ 41, 2007; p. 250–257.

Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, Hudes PD. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat, 2005; p. 18:56–63.

Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Holland BK. Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anat Sci Educ., 2008; p. 1:3–9.

Vasan NS, DeFouw D. Team learning in a medical gross anatomy course. Med Educ., 2005; p. 39:524.

Nagaswami S. Vasan, David O. DeFouw, Scott Compton. A Survey of student perceptions of Team-Based Learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades. Anat Sci Educ. 2, 2009; p. 150–155

Michaelsen, L.K., Watson, W.E., Cragin, J.P., and Fink, L.D. (1982) Team-based learning: A potential solution to the problems of large classes. Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 7(4): 18-33.'

Michaelsen L, Richards B (2005). "Drawing conclusions from the team-learning literature in health-sciences education: a commentary". Teaching and learning in medicine 17 (1): 85–88. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_15. PMID 15691820.

Larry K. Michaelsen, Arletta Bauman Knight, and L. Dee Fink (2002). "Chapter 2: Getting Started with Team Learning". Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups. New York: Praeger. ISBN 0-89789-863-X.

Garland D. Assessment issues in-group work. Group and Interactive Learning. 1994:417-422.

Chung EK, Rhee JAE, Baik YH, A OS. The effect of team-based learning in medical ethics education. Med Teach. 2009; 31(11): 1013- 1017.

Vasan N, DeFouw D, Compton S. A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: Favorable views unrelated to grades. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(4): 150-155.

Davidson LK. A 3-year experience implementing blended TBL: active instrumental methods can shift student attitudes to learning. Med Teach. 2011; 33(9): 750-753.

Abdelkhalek N, Hussein A, Gibbs T, Hamdy H. Using team- based learning to prepare medical students for future problem-based learning. Med Teach. 2010; 32(2): 123-129.

Koles P, Stolfi A, Borges N, Nelson S, Parmelee D. The impact of team-based learning on medical students’ academic performance. Acad Med. 2010; 85(11): 1739-1745.

Carmichael J. Team-based learning enhances performance in introductory biology. J Coll Sci Teach. 2009; 38(4): 54-61.

Fatmi M, Hartling L, Hillier T, Campbell S, Oswald AE. The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Med Teach. 2013; 35 (12): 1608-1624.

Nelson M, Allison SD, McCollum M, et al. The Regis Model for pharmacy education: A highly integrated curriculum delivered by Team-Based Learning (TBL). Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2013; 5 (6): 555-563.

Kelly PA, Haidet P, Schneider V, Searle N, Seidel C, Richards B. A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the STROBE classroom observation tool. Teach Learn Med. 2005; 17(2): 112-118.

Ofstad W, Brunner L. Team-based learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013; 77(4): Article 70.

Allen RE, Copeland J, Franks AS, et al. Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013; 77(6): Article 115.

Larry K. Michaelsen, Arletta Bauman Knight, and L. Dee Fink (2002). Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups. New York: Praeger. ISBN 0-89789-863-X.

Shahid H, Imtiaz B, Nabiha GH. Students’ perceptions about the immediate feedback assessment technique (IF-AT) in team based learning using pre-test versus post-test evaluation. EiMJ, 2017; 12(4): p. 17-23.

Howard Hills (2001) Team Based Learning Gower Publishing Company ISBN 0-566-08364-7.

https://www.aamc.org/download/154730/data/rime_poster_109.pdf

Kelly PA, Haidet P, Schneider V, Searle N, Seidel CL, Richards BF (2005). "A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the STROBE classroom observation tool". Teaching and learning in medicine 17 (2): 112–118. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_4. PMID 15833720.

Dunaway G. Adaption of team learning to an introductory graduate pharmacology course. Teach Learn Med. 2005; 17(1): 56-62.

Wiener H, Plass R, Marz R. Team-based learning intensive course format for first-year medical students. Med Educ. 2009; 50(1): 69-76.

Parmelee D, DeStephen D, Borges N. Medical students’ attitudes about team-based learning in a pre-clinical curriculum. Med Educ. 2009; 14(1).

Gallegos P, Peeters JM. A measure of teamwork perceptions for team-based learning. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2011; 3(1): 30-35.

Haidet P, Morgan RO, O’Malley KJ, Moran BJ, Richards BF. 2004. A controlled trial of active versus passive learning strategies in a large group set- ting. Adv Health Sci Educ 9:15–27.

Schmidt HG, De Volder ML, De Grave WS, Moust JHC, Patel VL. 1989. Ex- planatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. J Educ Psychol 81:610–619.

Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. & Arfstrom, K.M. (2013), A review of flipped learning, Flipped Learning Network, www.flippedlearning.org.

Michaelsen, L.K. & Sweet, M. (2008), 'The Essential Elements of Team-Based Learning', New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 116, pp. 7-27.

Moore KL, Dalley AF. 2006. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 5th Ed. Philadel- phia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. 1209 p.

Ward M, Gruppen L, Regehr G. 2002. Measuring self-assessment: Current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ 7:63–80.

Ashraf, M. 2004. A critical look at the use of group projects as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 213-216.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v10i1.588

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


2180-1932 (C) Universiti Sains Malaysia Press, Universiti Sains Malaysia.